Attorney General of Canada, et al. v. Collins Family Trust, et al.
Attorney General of Canada
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Michael Taylor

Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Dayna Anderson

Collins Family Trust
Law Firm / Organization
Dentons Canada LLP
Lawyer(s)

Joel A. Nitikman

Cochran Family Trust
Law Firm / Organization
Dentons Canada LLP
Lawyer(s)

Joel A. Nitikman

Two corporations implemented a plan devised by a tax professional to protect corporate assets from future creditors. The plans were intended not to incur income tax liability. In part, the plans involved each corporation issuing dividends to a newly-created family trust. The effectiveness of the plan depended on a widely-accepted interpretation of s. 75(2) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.). At the time the plans were implemented, the interpretation was shared by Canada Revenue Agency. Sommerer v. Canada, 2011 TCC 21, affirmed 2012 FCA 207, subsequently adopted a narrower interpretation of s. 75(2). Canada Revenue Agency issued notices of reassessment to each family trust for the taxation years in which dividends were paid. Objections to the reassessments were unsuccessful. The Supreme Court of British Columbia granted equitable recission of the payments of dividends. The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal.
Supreme Court of Canada
39383
Civil litigation
No uploaded documents