Little Black Bear First Nation v. Kawacatoose First Nation
LITTLE BLACK BEAR FIRST NATION
Law Firm / Organization
Maurice Law
DAY STAR FIRST NATION
Law Firm / Organization
Missens Law
Lawyer(s)

Bonnie Missens

GEORGE GORDON FIRST NATION
Law Firm / Organization
Missens Law
Lawyer(s)

Bonnie Missens

KAWACATOOSE FIRST NATION
Law Firm / Organization
Semaganis Worme Legal
MUSCOWPETUNG FIRST NATION
Law Firm / Organization
Missens Law
Lawyer(s)

Bonnie Missens

MUSKOWEKWAN FIRST NATION
Law Firm / Organization
Missens Law
Lawyer(s)

Bonnie Missens

PASQUA FIRST NATION
Law Firm / Organization
Missens Law
Lawyer(s)

Bonnie Missens

PEEPEEKISIS FIRST NATION
Law Firm / Organization
Missens Law
Lawyer(s)

Bonnie Missens

PIAPOT FIRST NATION
Law Firm / Organization
Missens Law
Lawyer(s)

Bonnie Missens

STANDING BUFFALO DAKOTA FIRST NATION
STAR BLANKET FIRST NATION
Law Firm / Organization
McKercher LLP
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA

- Parties: The applicant was Little Black Bear First Nation. The respondents were Kawacatoose First Nation, Pasqua First Nation, Piapot First Nation, Muscowpetung First Nation, George Gordon First Nation, Muskowekwan First Nation, Day Star First Nation, Star Blanket First Nation, Standing Buffalo Dakota First Nation, Peepeekisis First Nation, and His Majesty the King in Right of Canada.

- Subject Matter: The Specific Claims Tribunal decided that – of the 11 First Nations alleging that they were beneficiaries of Indian Reserve No. IR 80A as Indians of the Touchwood Hills or of the Qu’Appelle Valley – eight of them were beneficiaries. The applicants in the cases of A-303-19 and A-328-19, who were among the First Nations denied beneficiary status, sought judicial review of the Tribunal’s decision. The issue was whether the appeal court should set aside the decision insofar as it excluded the applicants from the class of beneficiaries.

- Ruling: The appeal court ruled in the respondents’ favour and dismissed the judicial review applications. The appeal court concluded that the applicants failed to establish that the decision was unreasonable. The appeal court did not accept the applicants’ arguments that the Tribunal erred by misunderstanding the evidence and the agreed issues and by failing to apply principles stemming from the Crown’s honour.

- Date: The hearing was set on Sept. 26, 2023. The court released its decision on July 12, 2024.

- Venue: This was a federal case before the Federal Court of Appeal.

- Amount: The appeal court awarded costs in an unspecified amount.

Federal Court of Appeal
A-303-19
Aboriginal law
$ 0
Respondent
29 August 2019