Hrusa et al v CannTrust Holding Inc. et al
HRUSA, PATRICK
Law Firm / Organization
Strosberg Sasso Sutts LLP
SINGH, DHARAMBIR
Law Firm / Organization
Strosberg Sasso Sutts LLP
CANNTRUST HOLDING INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
PAUL, ERIC
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
ACETO, PETER
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
GUYATT, GREG
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
ABRAMOWITZ, IAN
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
DAWBER, MARK
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
KADEN, JOHN
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
LITWIN, MARK
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
MARCOVITCH, ROBERT
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
SANDERS, MITCHELL
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
ABRAMOWITZ, STAN
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
ROGERS, BRAD
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
RAVENSDALE, MICHAEL
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
PAGE, SHAWNA
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
PLATT, ILLANA
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
LEE, GRAHAM
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
GREEN, BRADY
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
KIRK, ANDREA
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
PAUL, NORMAN
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
KPMG LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
MERRILL LYNCH CANADA INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS CANADA INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (CANADA) INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
RBC DOMINION SECURITIES INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
JEFFERIES SECURITIES INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
CANACCORD GENUITY CORP.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
CANNAMED FINANCIAL CORP.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
CAJUN CAPITAL CORPORATION
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented

- Parties: The plaintiffs were Patrick Hrusa and Dharambir Singh. The defendants included CannTrust Holding Inc., Eric Paul, Peter Aceto, Greg Guyatt, Ian Abramowitz, Mark Dawber, John Kaden, Mark Litwin, Robert Marcovitch, and Mitchell Sanders.

- Subject Matter: This was a commercial list matter heard by videoconference. This case is ongoing.

- Date: The hearing was set on Apr. 12, 2024.

- Venue: This was a case before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

- Amount: This case was valued at $0.

Commercial List
CV-22-00691258-00CL
Corporate & commercial law
$ 0
08 August 2019
No uploaded documents