Laura Johnson applied for parental benefits on March 4, 2021, selecting extended parental benefits.
The Employment Insurance Act stipulates choices between standard (35 weeks) and extended (61 weeks) benefits are final once paid.
In October 2021, based on her accountant's advice, Ms. Johnson tried switching to standard benefits.
The Canada Employment Insurance Commission denied this change.
Ms. Johnson appealed to the Social Security Tribunal General Division, citing the application as misleading.
The General Division agreed, stating her intention aligned with the standard benefits' one-year leave.
The Commission challenged this in the Tribunal's Appeal Division.
The Appeal Division found the General Division erred but upheld Ms. Johnson was misled, invalidating her initial choice.
On May 10, 2022, the Appeal Division reversed the Commission's decision.
The Attorney General of Canada seeks to review this decision.
Prior rulings ("Karval v. Canada, 2021" and "Canada v. Hull, 2022") emphasize irrevocability of benefits choice post-payment.
The final takeaway: The Appeal Division's decision is deemed unreasonable, and a judicial review is recommended without sending it back to the Social Security Tribunal.
