19 Mar 2024
Pass Herald Ltd. v. Google LLC
Background:
- Pass Herald Ltd. filed a class action lawsuit against Google and Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook), alleging anti-competitive practices in the digital advertising market.
- The lawsuit claims damages totaling $8 billion for breaches of the Competition Act, including conspiracy, bid-rigging, and misrepresentation.
- To finance the litigation, Pass Herald entered into a Litigation Funding Agreement (LFA) with Omni Bridgeway (Fund 5) Canada Investments Ltd., seeking court approval for the LFA.
Legal Issues:
- Approval of the amended LFA based on its fairness, reasonableness, and contribution to access to justice.
- Whether the LFA is champertous (improperly speculative) and whether it protects the interests of the class members and defendants.
Court’s Analysis and Decision:
- The court examined whether the LFA satisfied procedural and evidentiary requirements, contributed to access to justice, and was fair to all parties involved.
- The LFA was found not to be champertous, with a structured return on investment capped at $100 million, ensuring it was within reasonable and proportionate limits.
- The court approved the LFA but limited its approval to scenarios where the return to the funder did not exceed 10% of the total claim proceeds, reserving the right to reassess if returns exceeded this percentage.
Outcome:
- The LFA was approved with limitations, ensuring the funding arrangement was necessary for access to justice and not overly burdensome to class members.
- The court maintained the confidentiality of certain LFA terms, considering the commercial sensitivity and potential impact on litigation strategy.
- No amount specified for costs/.award.