Plaintiff
Defendant
Executive Summary – Key Legal and Evidentiary Issues
Disputed causation between the motor vehicle accident and the plaintiff’s ongoing physical and psychological symptoms.
Conflicting medical expert opinions on the extent, nature, and permanency of Mr. Chu’s injuries.
Assessment of credibility concerning Mr. Chu’s self-reported limitations and their consistency with surveillance and medical evidence.
Evaluation of future earning capacity based on limited work history and projected employability post-injury.
Quantification of damages for loss of housekeeping ability and care provided by family members (in-trust claims).
Determination of reasonable future care costs amid competing expert life care plans.
Facts of the Case
In March 2015, John Chu was rear-ended while stopped at a red light in Burnaby, B.C. Although the crash caused only minor damage to his vehicle, Chu said it left him with lasting injuries. He claimed:
Chronic pain in his neck, back, and shoulders
Memory and concentration problems (cognitive issues)
Depression and anxiety
Trouble working and handling daily tasks
Chu sued the other driver, Jordan Brammer, for damages, arguing that the accident severely impacted his health and ability to earn a living.
Arguments and Court’s Analysis
The case centered on whether Chu’s health issues were truly caused by the crash — and whether they were as serious as he claimed.
Key Issues the Court Considered:
Medical experts gave conflicting opinions: Some supported Chu’s version of events, others believed his symptoms were exaggerated or unrelated.
Surveillance videos showed Chu doing tasks (like shopping or traveling) that didn’t match his description of his limitations.
Chu had a spotty work history even before the crash, making it hard to say the accident alone reduced his earning capacity.
His wife cared for him after the crash, but the court found the time and intensity of her support was overstated.
The judge believed Chu did suffer real injuries — but not to the extent he claimed.
Final Outcome: What the Court Awarded
After reviewing all the evidence, the court awarded Chu a total of $454,335.56 in damages, broken down as follows:
Type of Damages | Amount |
---|---|
Non-pecuniary damages | $140,000.00 |
Past loss of earning capacity | $135,430.00 |
Future loss of earning capacity | $164,376.00 |
Future care costs | $800.00 |
Loss of housekeeping capacity | $0.00 |
In-trust claim | $7,000.00 |
Special damages (agreed) | $6,729.56 |
Total | $454,335.56 |
Court
Supreme Court of British ColumbiaCase Number
S221895Practice Area
Personal injury lawAmount
$ 454,336Winner
PlaintiffTrial Start Date
Download documents