M.P. Lundy Construction Inc. v. Wildpine Residence Inc.
M.P. LUNDY CONSTRUCTION INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Rasmussen Starr Ruddy LLP
Lawyer(s)

Nadia J. Authier

WILDPINE RESIDENCE INC.
Law Firm / Organization
BD Law Offices
Lawyer(s)

Martin Black

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
CANAM BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Lawyer(s)

Simon Gollish

Background

  • The plaintiff, M.P. Lundy Construction Inc. (General Contractor), seeks $2.6 million under a CCDC2 Stipulated Price Contract for a retirement residence.
  • WRI counterclaimed for $12.2 million, alleging breach of contract, misrepresentation, negligence, and bad faith.
  • The trial is scheduled for March 2026.

Motion & Issue

  • The plaintiff moved to remove Gibson LLP and its principal, D. Kenneth Gibson, as WRI’s counsel.
  • Key Issue: Whether Gibson’s dual role as lawyer and material witness compromised trial integrity.

Court’s Decision

  • Motion Granted. Gibson LLP removed as WRI’s counsel.
  • Key Reasons:
    • Gibson is a material witness whose credibility will be assessed at trial.
    • Conflict of interest: He was both a decision-maker at WRI and its legal counsel.
    • Lack of independence: Junior counsel at Gibson LLP was acting under Gibson’s direction rather than independently.
    • No undue delay: Plaintiff’s motion was not deemed tactical or unfairly timed.
    • Adequate time for WRI to retain new counsel before trial.

Order

  • WRI must appoint new counsel within 60 days.
  • Cost submissions due within 30 days.
  • The court did not make a final ruling on damages, lien claims, or counterclaims in this decision.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-19-82333
Construction law
Plaintiff