Shaker v. Lovo Corp et al.
RICHARD ROSS SHAKER
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

B. Tessier

LOVO CORP.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
JONATHAN LAGACE
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Katie Miller
Law Firm / Organization
Brauti Thorning LLP
Lawyer(s)

Payam Ezzatian

Overview

  • Motion: Richard Ross Shaker (Shaker) sought to amend his claim to add Katie Miller as a defendant.
  • Defendant's Position: Miller argued the claim was time-barred under the Limitations Act, 2002.

Key Legal Issues

  1. Limitation Period:

    • Section 4 of the Limitations Act, 2002 imposes a two-year limitation from when a claim is "discovered."
    • Discovery occurs when a plaintiff has actual or constructive knowledge of material facts supporting a plausible inference of liability.
  2. Plaintiff’s Knowledge Timeline:

    • October 2021: Shaker suspected unauthorized access to his laptop.
    • July 27, 2022: In an affidavit, he explicitly alleged Miller accessed his laptop.
    • August 14, 2024: He served Miller with the motion to add her as a defendant.
    • The court held that by July 27, 2022, he had sufficient knowledge to bring a claim, making it statute-barred by August 2024.

Court’s Findings

  • Later evidence (2023–2025) only expanded on facts known by 2022.
  • The claim against Miller was time-barred and lacked a live issue on discoverability.
  • The motion to amend was denied.

Disposition

  • Motion dismissed.
  • The judgment did not grant any monetary damages because it only addressed the procedural issue of amending the claim.
  • Cost submissions due by April 7, 2025, if unresolved.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-24-14794
Civil litigation
Other