MHCare Medical Corp. v Pike
MHCare Medical Corporation o/a MHCare Medical
Law Firm / Organization
Stillman LLP
Sam Mraiche
Law Firm / Organization
Stillman LLP
Nathan Pike
Breakdown Media

Issue: Plaintiffs, MHCare Medical Corp. & Sam Mraiche, sought an interlocutory injunction preventing Defendants, Nathan Pike & Breakdown Media, from publishing content about them amid an ongoing defamation lawsuit.

Court’s Findings

  • Injunction Denied:
    • Injunctions restraining speech in defamation cases are granted only in exceptional circumstances.
    • Defendants expressed intent to justify their statements under justification, fair comment, and responsible communication in the public interest.
    • Plaintiffs failed to establish that these defences would “inevitably fail”, as government investigations into procurement issues were ongoing.
  • Defamation Allegations:
    • Claims regarding MHCare’s acetaminophen imports and alleged improper government contracting were deemed potentially defamatory, but Defendants’ defences required trial assessment.
  • Publication of Private Information:
    • Contractor’s home address was publicly available but voluntarily removed by Pike.
    • Family members’ employment and political donations were lawfully published and did not constitute harassment.
  • Social Media Responsibility:
    • Pike must monitor and remove threatening third-party comments.
  • Next Steps:
    • Parties must submit cost arguments within 30 days if unresolved.
    • Defendants’ cross-application on document disclosure must follow standard court processes.
  • No damages or costs were awarded in the decision.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2403 24935
Media & communications law
Defendant