Ontario Superior Court rejects additional funds claim from common-law spouse's estate

She claimed a secret trust existed between her partner and one of the estate trustees

Ontario Superior Court rejects additional funds claim from common-law spouse's estate

The Ontario Superior Court dismissed an applicant’s request for additional funds from the respondent's estate, the estate of her late common-law partner.

In Germana v Fennema Estate, 2024 ONSC 2011, the court found that the estate had fulfilled obligations to the applicant, Estelle Germania, under her common-law partner Mike Fennema’s will and their cohabitation agreement. Germania had received $1 million from Fennema's estate—$750,000 as designated in his will and $250,000 under the cohabitation agreement. Despite this, she sought an extra $1 million, claiming a secret trust existed between Fennema and one of the estate trustees. The court rejected this claim.

The dispute focused on two primary issues. Firstly, Germania claimed the estate trustees held $1 million in trust for her based on an alleged secret trust. Secondly, she argued that Fennema’s will had not made adequate provisions for her support, entitling her to additional support under the Succession Law Reform Act.

The Superior Court examined the couple’s financial arrangements and history during the trial. Shortly after they began cohabiting, Germania and Fennema signed a cohabitation agreement that asserted their financial independence and included a mutual waiver of claims against each other’s estates. The agreement stipulated payments to Germania upon Fennema's death, which were honoured, except a pending $50,000 related to moving expenses, which the estate acknowledged and agreed to pay.

Regarding the secret trust, the court found no evidence that Fennema intended to establish such an arrangement in his communications before his death. The court also confirmed that the estate trustees acted according to the terms of the will and the cohabitation agreement.

In assessing the claim for additional support, the court ruled that Fennema had made adequate provisions for Germania’s support, considering her assets, pension income, and the terms of the cohabitation agreement, alongside the payments she had already received.

Ultimately, the court denied Germania's request for additional support and granted the estate trustees their costs pending any resolution between the parties regarding this matter.

Recent articles & video

Legal profession approaching genAI with hesitancy, but also excitement: Thomson Reuters report

Manitoba Chief Justice Marianne Rivoalen on going digital and what informs her judicial philosophy

The search is on for the Top 25 Most Influential Lawyers

Law Society of Manitoba issues guidelines to help lawyers navigate generative AI in practice

National Council for Reconciliation Act officially becomes law

Ontario Superior Court emphasizes estate trustee must account for trust property

Most Read Articles

BC Court of Appeal upholds monthly spousal support for ex-RCMP officer despite claims of hardship

Ontario Court of Appeal dismisses malpractice suit over child who was assaulted after doctor visit

Ontario Court of Appeal restores owner's right to repurchase property after initial buyback fails

Ontario Superior Court emphasizes estate trustee must account for trust property