Dirani v. Canada
WASSEEM DIRANI
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
HIS MAJESTY THE KING
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Devon E. Peavoy

  • Background:

    • Wasseem Dirani was the sole shareholder and director of a company that rented VHS tapes from 1997 to 2001.
    • The company dissolved in late 2001.
    • Dirani claimed bad debt expenses for the 2006 and 2007 tax years, which the Minister of National Revenue denied.
    • Dirani also sought deductions for allowable business investment losses, which were similarly denied by the Minister.
  • Tax Court Decision:

    • The Tax Court dismissed Dirani’s appeals, concluding that he failed to prove the existence of bad debt expenses or allowable business investment losses.
    • The Court found no evidence that Dirani had advanced money to the company or incurred any bad debt.
  • Appeal Issues:

    • The main issue on appeal was whether the Tax Court erred in concluding that Dirani failed to prove his claims.
    • Dirani argued that he was not required to retain the company’s records beyond two years after its dissolution, as per section 5800 of the Income Tax Regulations.
  • Federal Court of Appeal Findings:

    • The obligation to retain records extends until six years after the tax year, and longer if there are objections or appeals.
    • Section 5800 applies to dissolved corporations, not individual taxpayers.
    • The expiry of record retention periods does not exempt taxpayers from evidentiary burdens in court.
    • Dirani's failure to maintain records undermined his ability to meet his evidentiary burden.
    • There was no palpable and overriding error in the Tax Court’s findings.
  • Conclusion:

    • The appeal was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent. No amount specified.
Federal Court of Appeal
A-309-19
Taxation
Respondent