Case Summary: Sajjad Asghar v. Canada involves Asghar's appeal from Federal Court decisions, where his claim against the federal Crown was struck for being obviously unsustainable, concerning allegations of a conspiracy to harm him. The Federal Court of Appeal upheld the decision to strike the claim, citing deficiencies such as non-justiciability, frivolousness, and limitation periods.
Key Points:
Asghar's appeal argued for a different legal test due to the organized crime nature of his claims, which the Court rejected.
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing adherence to established legal standards for striking claims and dismissing appeals.
The case highlights the importance of justiciability and the limitations on claims against the Crown, with no costs awarded due to procedural non-compliance by both parties.
