Items filtered by date: June 2016
As Alberta’s economy languishes and funding streams dry up, local non-profits say initiatives like Field LLP’s Community Fund Program become all the more important.
|Steve Eichler, a partner at Field LLP, presents Marla Rabinovitch, of Soup Sisters, with a Community Fund Program prizes for its Souper Kids initiative in southern Alberta.|
Now in its fourth year, the western Canadian law firm’s initiative is dishing out $75,000 to a number of local community initiatives across Alberta and the Northwest Territories.
“It’s a real tough environment right now in Alberta. The economy is tough and as you probably know, oil and gas is suffering very badly which trickles down to everybody,” says Diana Segboer, the executive director of the Pet Access League Society — one of this year’s recipients.
“So it’s a tight economy and it’s an amazing gift for us to be able to bring this program to the kids.”
Field LLP, which has offices in Calgary, Edmonton and Yellowknife, has seen the pool of applicants grow to a record 122 projects this year, up from 105 applications in 2015.
Doreen Saunderson, the firm’s managing partner, says that the number of applicants has likely grown in part because more organizations are finding ways to meet their needs.
“Organizations are having a harder time finding funding and more and more people are identifying needs and creating programs to try to fill the needs that are observed now too,” she says.
“So I think it’s both that there are new ideas coming out of the woodwork and a greater need for funding for those programs.”
The firm recently announced five winners of the competition from southern Alberta, where there was a 23-per-cent increase of applications this year, and a total of 71 applicants.
Field LLP gave five winners a total of $30,000 — with $10,000 going to the grand prize winner and $5,000 to each runner up.
Among them was the Adapted Bike Program, a Calgary Cerebral Palsy Association initiative, which won the grand prize and provides customized bikes for children with disabilities.
Sheralee Stelter, the executive director of Cerebral Palsy Kids and Families, says the prize money will go towards buying bikes that could end up helping 50 to 60 children over the years.
“This donation is crucial to getting kids on bikes,” says Stelter.
Other prize winners included the Pet Access League Society’s pet therapy program for schools, as well as an outdoor classroom for an independent Calgary school, the Phoenix Education Foundation.
“It is absolutely essential,” Larry Leach, the school’s business manager says of the prize money. “The project wouldn’t have gone on without it. We should be able to fund the entire project.”
The other projects that rounded out the five winners this year were the Women’s Centre, which supports women in times of crisis and provides them with personal care items and food, and Souper Kids, an initiative that produces soup for local emergency shelters.
The program selected its winners based on a combination of online voting and the decisions of a panel of judges made up of Field LLP lawyers, clients and community members.
A further $30,000 was disbursed to initiatives in northern Alberta and $15,000 was given to programs in the Northwest Territories.
For those who did not get funding this year, Saunderson says the program will reboot again next year in the spring.
Saunderson says funding these kinds of projects has always been part of the firm’s culture.
“Our firm has always supported those organizations that our members belong to, but also been involved otherwise in giving in the community. Despite the recession, which affects all businesses in Alberta, we’re some of the fortunate ones that are still employed and still in business and still functioning and it’s important for us to give to the community on a consistent basis,” she says.
Woman summons RCMP with tablet after intruder took phone, Canadian Press
Cosby drops litigation against accuser in sex assault case, Canadian Press
A renowned rider originally not selected for the Canadian team at the upcoming Rio Olympics will now be included, after arbitration through the Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada.
|Robert Cohen says a recent arbitration involving an internationally ranked equestrian, and that overturned the selection of riders who would be attending the Rio Olympics, is ‘exceptional.’|
A selection panel had chosen four riders, and their respective horses — including Robinson, but not Phoenix — to compete in eventing, which arbitrator Robert P. Armstrong of Arbitration Place describes as “an equestrian competition where a single rider/horse combination competes in the three phases of dressage, cross country and show jumping.”
Phoenix, Don Good, owner of horses Pavarotti and Bentley’s Best, and Anita and Don Leschied, owner of the horse A Little Romance, argued that Phoenix “is and has been Canada’s leading Eventing competitor for the last 10 years with significant international achievements,” and that she “satisfied all Nomination Criteria to be appointed to the 2016 Olympic Team” riding Pavarotti or A Little Romance.
“They further submit that Kathryn Robinson, who was selected to the team with her horse, Let it Bee, simply does not measure up to Ms. Phoenix,” said the ruling.
Armstrong ultimately agreed, after arbitration took place July 6, and a decision on July 11. He ultimately ruled Phoenix should attend the Olympics with A Little Romance.
Peter Howard, of Stikeman Elliott LLP, told Legal Feeds by e-mail that “Ms Phoenix, her owners, and us as their counsel, have not and do not intend to comment on the ruling.”
The hinge of the decision were conversations that occurred at the Bromont CCI3, a competition in Quebec, where Phoenix did not ride with the horses Pavarotti and Bentley’s Best. The conversations in dispute were between Phoenix and Clayton Fredericks, who the ruling describes as “a former Olympian who competed in eventing competitions for Australia” and coach of the team, and between Fredericks and Good.
“Mr. Fredericks acknowledged that it was his view that Ms. Phoenix should have run Pavarotti and Bentley’s Best at the competition in Bromont. He acknowledged that he expressed this view to Ms. Phoenix. However, he denied that he threatened Ms. Pheonix that her failure to run the horses in Bromont would keep her off the Olympic team,” said the ruling.
Armstrong, however, said in his ruling that he accepted that “Fredericks earnestly believed that both horses needed another run at cross-country before the Selection Panel would meet.”
“However, he became a man with a mission on this issue and my assessment, unfortunately, is that he lost it,” said the ruling. “He told both Mr. Good and Ms. Phoenix that Ms. Phoneix’s four horses would not be considered for the Rio Games for failure to run in Bromont — an event that was clearly not mandatory.”
“It is essential that a selection panel proceeds impartially and applies the nomination criteria in a way that ensures fairness and also the appearance of fairness,” said the ruling. “The approach taken by Mr. Fredericks with Mr. Good and Ms. Phoenix fails that test.”
Robert Cohen, a partner in the advocacy group at Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, has acted in sports and entertainment arbitration disputes, and called the case “exceptional.”
Cohen was not involved in the case, but says he does “not think that this case will unhinge the deference that arbitrators and courts must show for reasonable decisions rendered by Olympic or other team selection panels acting in good faith and applying appropriate considerations.”
“This seems to be one of those rare cases where, through the [marshaling] of compelling evidence, a disgruntled athlete could actually demonstrate the appearance of bias, a flawed consideration of factors by the selection committee, and possibly undue pressure being placed on other members of a selection committee by an influential member, who was ‘on a mission’ to impose his own conditions for inclusion on a team, even though those conditions were not requirements of the published selection considerations,” says Cohen.
“In short, this was a perfect storm of evidence to demonstrate the improper exercise of discretion of a selection committee so as to allow the arbitrator to find that their decision was both procedurally and substantively flawed to such an extent that an arbitrator could justifiably ‘gallop’ over the selection panel’s expertise and decision.”
Facts about entrapment in relation to a B.C. terrorism trial, Canadian Press
Rifle maker wants documents sealed in school shooting suit, Canadian Press
It seems Canadian lawyers are spending fewer hours on pro bono work than they were last year.
|Gordon Baird says he's aiming for 50 pro bono hours per lawyer per year.|
The percentage of lawyers completing 10 hours or more of pro bono also dropped by more than 25 per cent, to 26.9 per cent from 36.3 in 2015.
The survey average was 39.2 pro bono hours per lawyer in the last year.
However, Nicholas Glicher, director, legal, and head of African Programmes at the Thomson Reuters Foundation based in Johannesburg, says only four Canadian firms — Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, Shearman & Sterling LLP, and Skadden, Arps Slate Meagher and Flom LLP — responded to TrustLaw’s request for data, which makes it difficult to “judge the whole of the Canadian pro bono community.”
In 2014, Canadian Lawyer conducted a pro bono survey offering more of an in-depth look at the Canadian pro bono market.
Gordon Baird, partner at McCarthy’s and chair of its National Pro Bono Committee, says he was surprised by the drop compared to last year’s index and is hoping to increase the firm’s hours up significantly.
“Our goal — although whether it’s ultimately achievable I don’t know — is to try to get to 50 hours per lawyer per year,” Baird says.
“We’re clearly well short of that but we’re always looking for good opportunities for pro bono projects for our lawyers. I would love to see the number higher than it is at the moment.”
Part of the problem, Baird says, is that much of the work out there isn’t suited to the kind of work the firm does. There’s a ton of demand for help with family law cases, for example, but “we don’t do family law,” he says.
“Part of our challenge is to find work that fits within our skillset,” Baird explains.
“We’re constantly searching for other referral sources of interesting work. We know the work is out there — it’s just a question of getting connected to it.”
Glicher says for future reports he’s hoping to get more information about the Canadian market.
“This will give us a much more rounded, fuller picture of what’s actually happening on the ground in Canada,” he says of the TrustLaw survey, now in its third year.
Baird suggests other Canadian firms may be challenged by the actual tracking of pro bono hours. At McCarthy’s the firm lawyers file pro bono hours just like billable hours and the information can be available from the firm’s accountants “within minutes.”
Shearman & Sterling, and Skadden Arps Slate Meagher and Flom are in fact U.S.-based multinational firms with Canadian offices.
“It is a little more difficult to stand out, particularly if firms are blending the numbers across borders because there’s a much stronger pro bono culture in the U.S. certainly than there is in Canada,” Baird says.
“It does create numbers that are a little difficult for us to compare. It may not be immediately apparent but I think it’s really apples and oranges — you’re not really comparing the same thing.”
Compiled using data from over 130 law firms, representing 64,500 lawyers in 75 countries, Glicher says the index aims to provide transparency on the amount of pro bono work being done across the globe and also offer information on how to structure a robust and sustainable pro bono program.
“At the moment the U.S. market is light years ahead of the rest of the world when it comes to pro bono, and there is much more data about pro bono in the U.S. than there is in any other market — I’m in no doubt that those two things are linked,” Glicher says.
Of the firms who responded, 65 per cent have a pro bono policy, 85 per cent employ a pro bono coordinator, and 60 per cent have a pro bono committee. These structures have a significant effect on pro bono engagement levels.
The data shows pro bono engagement levels are spreading beyond the traditional markets. China’s pro bono work has grown 211 per cent since the first index in 2014, with lawyers there clocking an average of 37 hours annually — a number that rivals established markets such as Australia and England and Wales. Glicher says Asia has seen a 40 per cent year-on-year increase since the survey began.
“There’s such a swift globalization of law firms at the moment and what this brings is an understanding of how to build comprehensive pro bono programs.”
The survey also reports a substantial increase in the selection of the “Immigration, Refugees and Asylum” topic as a key focus area for pro bono work.
41.4 per cent of firms — compared to 24 per cent last year and 28 per cent the year before that — saw more pro bono hours dedicated to this area.
He says the rise in focus on the global refugee crisis shows a willingness of law firms to use their significant resources and expertise to “help tackle one of the greatest challenges we are facing, potentially, in this generation.”
A new generation of Asian lawyers are eager to assume leadership roles, says David Namkung, newly elected president of the Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers B.C. branch, an organization that is quickly attracting Asian legal professionals to its ranks — up to 228 members in 2016 from last year's 83 members.
Namkung says he hopes to further guide FACL BC's continued growth and provide opportunities for young Asian lawyers to hone leadership skills and build community connections to aid in advancing their careers within law firms and the legal community.
“There is a big gap in leadership in law firms and organizations,” says Namkung, as earlier waves of Asian immigrant Canadians didn't see law as a favoured profession since it required strong language skills. As a result, there is not a large legacy base of Asian lawyers in leadership roles within law firms and associations today to provide that leadership and mentorship for young lawyers.
FACL, a national organization, is playing a strong role in providing that platform and connecting students with practising lawyers with judiciary and professional association members who have Asian roots. One of the founding members of FACL, Justice Maryka Omatsu, was on hand for the FACL BC annual general meeting in Vancouver where Namkung assumed leadership from retiring president Jennifer Lau. Omatsu said the organization now numbers 1,500 strong across Canada and continues to grow. Omatsu, semi-retired, was appointed to the Ontario Court of Justice in 1993 and was the first Asian woman appointed to a Canadian court. She has been honoured as a trail-blazer in the legal profession.
An early foundation of lawyers in Canada was hampered by exclusionary legislation, with Vancouver-born Kew Dock Yip, the son of a Chinatown merchant, becoming the first Chinese-Canadian lawyer despite being unable to enter law at the University of British Columbia. After three attempts at entering Toronto's Osgoode Hall Law School he finally gained admittance and a law degree in 1945. Yip went on to have the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923 repealed by the Canadian government in 1947. It opened the doors for a second wave of Chinese immigration.
Namkung said it is the third wave of immigration from the 1980s that is on the front lines of challenging what has become known as the “bamboo ceiling.”
This third wave are children of wealthier immigrants whose families were left in B.C. to take advantage of the education system while the fathers flew between Canada and another country where they worked.
"We are now seeing more numbers in law schools," Namkung says, as these individuals consider a profession in law rather than traditional areas such as accounting, sciences, or medicine.
In his role as the new FACL BC president, Namkung, a partner in The Counsel Network, wants to ensure the organization continues attracting and supporting members in leadership development.
“We want to ensure that our growth is sustainable so we can invest in our administration,” he says.
FACL BC has hired its first staff member on a contract basis.
Another priority for Namkung is advocating for diversity in the judiciary and through professional organizations such as the Canadian Bar Association and Law Society of B.C. He also wants to see FACL BC take a higher profile and establish partnerships with other organizations both inside and outside the legal community to ensure “not just inward diversity but outward diversity.”
The new 2016-17 executive for FACL BC are: president Namkung; vice president Maria Kim, Population Data BC, University of B.C.; secretary-treasurer Louisa Winn, BC Ministry of Justice, Criminal Justice Branch; and retiring president Jennifer Lau, Allard School of Law at UBC, Career Services Office.
New board members are: Kristian Arciago, 2016 call; Sena Byun, Telus Corp.; Stephen Hsia, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP; Vania Kim, Lindsay LLP; Mark Leung, Broadband TV; Jessica Lo, Lindsay Kenney LLP; Roland Luo, sole practitioner; Christopher Yan, Lawson Lundell LLP; and Linda Yang, McMillan LLP.
Existing board members are: Samson Chan, Campbell Froh May & Rice LLP; Karla Mukai, Campbell Froh May & Rice LLP; Mary Salaysay, BC Ministry of Justice, Criminal Justice Branch; Will Tao, Larlee Rosenberg; and Pablo Tseng, Gowling WLG.
Law students serving as directors for the various B.C. universities are: Alyssa Leung, University of B.C.; David Fung, University of Victoria; and Oliver Leung Thompson Rivers University.
Bail revoked for man convicted in 2015 sexual assault, Canadian Press
Judge set to decide on $15B Volkswagen settlement, Canadian Press
In a battle likened to David defeating Goliath, two provincial regulators have confirmed a junior mining exploration company in British Columbia can proceed with a $6 million private placement offering, despite a hostile takeover bid by a bigger American silver mining company.
|Fred Pletcher says a junior mining exploration company he represented in a legal battle is pleased with the finding that will allow the company to close a $ 6 million private placement offering, despite a takeover bid.|
The news comes after a two-day joint hearing last week before the British Columbia Securities Commission and the Ontario Securities Commission, pitting B.C.’s Dolly Varden Silver Corporation against Hecla Mining Company, of Idaho.
According to an Ontario Securities Commission ruling, the volleys started on June 27, when Hecla announced its goal to buy all outstanding shares of Dolly Varden not already belonging to Hecla. On July 5, Dolly Varden countered by announcing it would go after private placement financing of up to $6 million.
On July 8, Hecla filed an application with the British Columbia Securities Commission to stop the private placement, while on July 11, Dolly Varden filed with the Ontario Securities Commission, alleging problems with the insider offer.
Last week, the commissions came back with favourable results for Dolly Varden.
“It’s a great result, obviously, for our client,” says Fred Pletcher, partner with Borden Ladner Gervais LLP and chair of the firm’s national mining group, who acted for Dolly Varden.
“There’s been a lot of commentary in the financial and legal press about whether hostile takeover, whether private placements, are the new poisoned pill as a preferred defensive strategy in response to hostile takeover bids in Canada, and a lot of people were looking at this decision as an important precedent on that point.”
Pletcher says it is “particularly an important case because in May of 2016, the takeover bid rules in Canada were significantly changed and this Dolly Varden decision is the first case to address an alleged defensive tactic since the new rules came into effect.”
The new rules in question fall under National Instrument 62-104, Take-Over Bids and Issuer Bids. Pletcher says “while some may view this as suggesting that private placements can be used as a poison pill as a tactical response to hostile takeover bids, I’d say it doesn’t really go that far, and the ruling isn’t carte blanche for targets to adopt private placements in response to bids.”
“There were a number of factual circumstances in this case which were fairly unique that suggested that Dolly Varden’s private placement wasn’t an abusive defensive tactic, and those facts may not be present in other circumstances,” says Pletcher.
Those who are interested in hostile takeovers — and defending from them — can learn from the background of the case.
“The first application was an application by Hecla Mining Company, which had launched an unsolicited takeover bid for Dolly Varden Silver Company to cease trade a private placement that Dolly Varden was proposing to enter into, and the Securities Commissions ruled against the application that Hecla had made so Dolly Varden is free to conduct its private placement,” says Pletcher.
The second application was one that Dolly Varden made to the Ontario Securities Commission that the Hecla takeover bid be required to include a formal valuation. This was under the insider bid requirements of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 — Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions.
“Hecla owns over 10 per cent of Dolly Varden and securities policies in Ontario and Quebec require a greater than 10 per cent shareholder to prepare a formal valuation, that’s prepared by an independent valuator and overseen by a special committee, not of the bidder but of the target, to address concerns that shareholders may have that they aren’t on a level playing field with the insider when it comes to information about the company,” says Pletcher.
“Hecla’s takeover bid had not included that formal valuation, and they said they were relaying on an exemption, but Dolly Varden didn’t think that was available so it made the application to the Ontario Securities Commission to have the valuation required for Hecla’s bid and Ontario has sided with Dolly Varden there, so the Hecla bid is effectively cease traded until they prepare and provide that valuation to Dolly Varden shareholders.”
Hecla was represented by Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP. A firm spokesperson said they were not able to provide comment on the matter.
No charges laid after man ignores warning, bitten by dog, Canadian Press
Subscribe to Legal Feeds
- Mallory Hendry
- Patricia Cancilla
- Gabrielle Giroday
- Elizabeth Raymer
- Alexia Kapralos
- Tim Wilbur
- Alex Robinson
- Jennifer Brown
- Karen Lorimer