Web exclusive content
Monday, 31 March 2014 11:29 Written by Colin Campbell and James Swanson
In the January 2014 edition of Canadian Lawyer, Dera J. Nevin devoted her Tech Support column to a discussion of Sedona Canada, entitled “Filling a gap: What is the Sedona Conference Working Group 7, and why does it matter?” Ms. Nevin, who is a member of the Sedona Conference Working Group Series, describes the mission of Working Group 7 (known as Sedona Canada) and its open membership policy. She also identifies Sedona Canada’s landmark achievements in the area of electronic discovery and disclosure in civil litigation, including the publication of The Sedona Canada Principles in 2008 and their subsequent adoption by reference into the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as the publication for public comment of several commentaries on related topics.
In Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes, the Supreme Court of the United States held that in order for class certification to be granted, judges must undertake a “rigorous analysis.” Of course, judicial analysis should be rigorous so we know the court must have meant something else. It turns out it did.
Monday, 24 March 2014 08:00 Written by Daniel Glasner
For all lawyers, client relationship building is an enormous part of what we do. Building trust, creating solutions, and proving yourself as a partner to the client is critical to success. It’s also increasingly difficult in an age where face time is limited and most of our communication is conducted via e-mail.
As we all know, technology (including software, infrastructure, data backup and restore, etc.) is increasingly being made available as a “service” on a trans-border/global “cloud” basis. For some interested buyers, this model raises the spectre of a host of concerns regarding the location of customers’ data, the preservation of data, confidentiality/security, the secondary use of data by vendors, and the actual location of vendors’ networks and systems.
Monday, 17 March 2014 08:00 Written by Stephen Mabey
This month’s column addresses the third “P” that today’s law firms need to tackle to ensure they are tomorrow’s law firms too. The January column addressed the need to have processes that ensure the efficient and effective delivery of legal services without which you could be out of step with clients’ needs. February’s dealt with the importance of having and sticking to a pricing strategy again without which you could be disengaging clients (unfortunately unknowingly).
Monday, 17 March 2014 08:00 Written by Damian J. Penny
|NewLaw New Rules — A conversation about the future of the legal services industry by George Beaton, Beaton Capital, 2013, pp. 210.|
Monday, 17 March 2014 08:00 Written by Jim Shanks