American Bar Association issues new ethics guidance for public lawyers

ABA provides guidance on how disqualification rules apply to current and former government lawyers

American Bar Association issues new ethics guidance for public lawyers

The American Bar Association's (ABA) Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has released a formal opinion guiding how disqualification rules apply to current and former government lawyers under the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct.

Formal Opinion 509 interprets Model Rule 1.11, which delineates the conflict-of-interest provisions that govern the professional conduct of lawyers who have served or are currently serving as government employees or officers. The essence of Rule 1.11, particularly paragraph (c), is to mitigate the potential misuse of confidential government information that could disadvantage individuals whom the information concerns.

Confidential government information, defined by the model rules, “information that has been obtained under governmental authority and which, at the time this rule is applied, the government is prohibited by law from disclosing to the public or has a legal privilege not to disclose and which is not otherwise available to the public.”

The guidance emphasizes that Rule 1.11 concerns itself with “a lawyer who acquired confidential government information while the lawyer was employed by or an official of the government, regardless of whether the lawyer seeking to represent the private client has now left government employ or office or maintains a private law practice (e.g., a part-time practice) while still in government employ or office.”

Formal Opinion 509 explicates the broad application of this rule, encompassing various scenarios where conflicts of interest may arise. This includes lawyers in private practice appointed as special prosecutors who also represent private clients, part-time prosecutors or attorneys general with private practices, and those engaged as counsel for towns or municipalities alongside their private client responsibilities.

This opinion is part of the ABA's ongoing efforts to provide clear, practical guidance to legal professionals. Through these formal opinions, the ABA seeks to aid lawyers, courts, and the public in interpreting and applying the model ethics rules to the specific challenges and dilemmas faced in legal practice, client-lawyer relationships, and judicial conduct.

Recent articles & video

Fifth annual Canadian Law Awards honours groundbreaking litigation and innovative firm initiatives

Roundup of law firm hires, promotions, departures: May 13, 2024 update

Blaney McMurtry appears in four commercial list suits this past week

Federal Court of Appeal sets hearings for patent, copyright, employment cases

A huge thank you to our Advisory Panel for dedicating time to judge the 2024 Canadian Law Awards

Federation of Law Societies raises concerns over BC’s Legal Professions Act

Most Read Articles

BC Court of Appeal rules deceased mother was incompetent to gift sentimental ring

Ontario Superior Court emphasizes estate trustee must account for trust property

BC Supreme Court rules for equal asset division in Port Alberni property dispute

2024 Canadian Law Awards winners announced